Your Invited!

Wednesday, May 16th. Kalamazoo County Road Commission, J.L Milling Company and Great Lakes Chloride, Inc. will partner to demonstrate the benefits of Calcium Chloride in the base stabilization process.

We are holding a “Lunch & Learn” to see the process of injecting Calcium @ the drum of the mill. Your invited, come out and see the process as it happens.

Details are on the invitation below. Hope to see you there.

Full Depth Demo 2 – 051612

Posted in Dust Control | Leave a comment

Ice Melt Products – Are Deicer Claims Full of Baloney???

Hello again. Just back and catching up from the APWA Snow Show in Milwaukee. What a great event. Lot’s of vendor displays, lot’s of new folks to talk with and share idea’s and talk about what works and what doesn’t. On that note, I just have to share a presentation done by Joe Althouse, Chemical Engineer for Occidental Chemical Corporation. I have known Joe for some time now and I have to say, he know’s of what he speaks. If he hasn’t proven the science, he will tell you it isn’t true and give you the details of why or why not something does or doesn’t work. His presentation gives you the “tools” to decide for yourself if deicer claims are fact or fiction Baloney. The one thing I gleaned from the presentation is that if your presented with claims that can’t be backed up with a study, be very careful about the validity of the claim.

Enough from me, take a look at the presentation and let me know what you think. It was very well received at the show.

Ice Melt Products – Are deicer claims full of baloney

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Direct Liquid Applications

It seems funny to be talking about winter at this time of year. But, for most road agencies, winter maintenance is the single most expensive activity in their budget. In an effort to reduce these cost Great Lakes Chloride will be partnering with Michigan DOT and Kalamazoo County Road Commission to perform winter de-icing using liquids, Calcium Chloride w/BOOST*.

The biggest issue with DLA is that it’s new to snow plow operators and the public. Like anything new, you will need to train crews to use the liquids properly. As with any tool there are times to take it out of the toolbox and times to put it back in.

Training, communication and documentation of your success and failures is important. If someone on your team see’s something going well or that is a problem. Talk about it then, don’t wait until spring or the next season to bring it up, it can’t be corrected then.

ClearRoads has an excellent power point presentation on DLA. Take a look.

http://www.clearroads.org/research-projects/downloads/0902-DLA-Slide-Presentation.pdf

This process has been used successfully across the country for over ten years now. The main reasons behind the move to liquids are, bare pavement quicker, faster clean up, increased level of service. To date across the country, DLA has been a salt brine operation. This partnership is two fold, prove the validity of DLA and show that using CaCl2 w/BOOST*, can provide lower operating temperatures, lower application rates, fewer return trips to the shop to refill, quicker clean up, increased service levels and reduced operating cost.

I will keep you posted as to our success.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Direct Liquid Application (Another Blogger’s Opinion)

A Blogger friend of mine (http://fleetgod-snowice.blogspot.com) submitted a post recently. He hits the nail right on the head in regard to liquid deicer use. Take a look.
Various agencies are researching the use of liquid chlorides for direct applications as a deicer agent in snow removal operations as opposed to use of granular materials.  As in most things, there are “pluses and minuses” in both processes.  One complaint I consistently hear is the “refreeze” of liquid applications is much quicker than granular.  Think about what you are saying for just a minute:  ”Liquid chlorides are effective as a melting agent as soon as the hit the pavement”.   Remember:  all chlorides work the same:  they effectively lower the freezing point, just like the glycol in your car radiator (ethylene or polypropylene).  The lowered freezing (euthetic) temperature stays constant as long as the percentage of anti-freeze to water or chloride to water remains consistent.  It is at this point that the deicing process and the engine radiator analogy differ.  The radiator solution will stay relatively the same unless there is a leak and more coolant has to be added.  The liquid chloride solution applied to the road starts diluting as soon as it is applied and initiates the melting process.  Once the solution becomes diluted to the point whereby its freeze protection is higher than the pavement temperature, you get a refreeze.  This science remains the same whether you apply straight granular sodium chloride, prewetted granular using sodium, calcium, or magnesium liquid chlorides, or straight liquid chlorides.  So why the potential for quicker refreeze when using liquids?  Because the liquids go to work much faster in the deicing process.  Granular salt does not become an effective deicer until it melts enough snow to form a brine.  Until that point, it really isn’t doing much for you.  If one would record the time from the liquid brine formation when it reaches the same chloride to liquid concentration versus a straight liquid chloride application until there is a refreeze…………you would find the time difference to be inconsequential.   The huge advantage to a straight liquid application is it provides is a safer driving surface for the motoring public much quicker than the 100% granular applications and it does not “bounce into the ditch”.  So, what do you do about the refreeze?  Couple of things:  match your application rate to temperature and amount of snowfall.   Warmer temperatures are great for liquid applications.  28 degrees +.  If you apply at lower temperatures, raise the application rate to delay any refreeze.  If there is a heavy snowfall……..you may need a higher application rate for liquid chloride or maybe you should use prewetted granular.  Prewetted granular and liquid chlorides both have a place in the snowfighters arsenal.  The exception could be very cold areas with huge amounts of snowfall, Upper Peninsula of Michigan being one example, where liquids might not be an option except as prewet agent.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Another Advantage of Using Calcium Chloride for Dust Control.

Image

Gravel Road this spring with no Dust Control Treatment in 2011. Note the rutting and potholes.

Image

This is the same gravel road, difference is this section was treated with 38% Calcium Chloride the previous season for dust control. As noted in a previous post, Calcium Chloride not only helps with dust control, it adds with compaction and prevents frost heaves and spring break up. This saves time and money for road agencies in added gravel, trucking and grading.

I will be doing additional research on the problems associated with Sodium Chloride (salt) and the damage it causes during the spring thaw and break up of gravel roads. This is becoming a real problem for agencies using mineral well brine and oil field brine with large amounts of salt being added to these roads during each application.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Image

Posted on by | Leave a comment

West Perth Returns to Calcium Chloride

Salt in dust control brine can cause problems. It loosens rather then compacts soils as Calcium Chloride does. Below is an article talking about the problems associated with brine and why they have chosen to replace mineral brine (salt as they call it) with Calcium Chloride.

West Perth Returns to Calcium Chloride Feb 22 2012

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment